James Turk has been writing about the Fear Index for years, as you can see in James Turk’s Free Gold Money Report.

They could not be more wrong.
Neither a rising price, nor anecdotal reports of increased buying are in any way proper evidence of a bubble. If we ignore the chatter and actually look at empirical data, it is quite easy to recognise a speculative bubble or mania. That is to say, an irrational and unsustainable overvaluation of an asset regardless of fundamentals, reinforced by the belief that it will continue to rise indefinitely. We have a number of very vivid examples in living memory: the dotcom bubble, the housing bubble, and history provides many more examples, John Law's Mississippi Bubble being the classic example.
A strict definition of a speculative bubble will therefore have two basic parts to it:
1. Irrational overvaluation. 2. Mass participation.
It is not enough for prices to go up, they must go up beyond what is justified by value. There must also be a psychological "herd" effect. If only a small minority takes part, it is difficult for a self-reinforcing feedback loop to happen. We've already explained how participation in the gold market remains the province of a tiny minority, even including all the "paper gold" instruments.
The importance of the GoldMoney Fear Index lies in answering the first question: What is the value of gold? As we've said before gold must be compared to its peers- other forms of money- in this case the US Dollar.

No comments:
Post a Comment